Tuesday, September 25, 2007 

What do venture capitalists look for in entrepreneurs?



Gary Fowler, an experienced analog technology recruiting specialist, explains what venture capitalists look for in entrepreneurs in whom they may be investing.
By Gary Fowler, Analog Solutions, Inc.
Planet Analog
June 29, 2007

As a follow-up to my last column "Is there still money to be made as an analog entrepreneur?" (click here), I wanted to expand on the startup theme and discuss what the investors are using to evaluate potentials deals. These factors usually fall into two categories: experience, and individual characteristics.
In the area of experience, first and foremost is the track record of the founding team. Having a successful exit or two brings instant credibility. The investors will look for achievements in each individual's background, as well as achievements in the specific industry.

Market knowledge is also a very important because, even though most investors have established relationships that allow them to do due diligence, they believe that a knowledge of the market is critical to achieve a desired outcome.
Reputation of the founders is another key component in evaluating the story. They want trustworthy people. They are about to give a great deal of money to a business run by an entrepreneur, and they want to be sure the manager of that business has a reputation in our industry that is outstanding. This does not mean, however, that an occasional "bad apple" does not slide through the cracks!

Leadership is also very important because someone has to run the business and the team. We see, time and again, examples of startups where the founders are replaced at some point. This is not something they relish, but on the other hand it does not indicate that any of these affected are blacklisted or labeled as failures. There are many reasons that changes are made.

When we look at the individual characteristics, there are six prime areas that are considered: The first is personalities. More often than not, the investor will invest in entrepreneurs that have a similar personality to themselves. After all, they are going to be spending a great deal of time in helping the team build a successful company and it doesn't make sense to pick a group of people that they will ultimately not get along with!

The second criterion that VCs will also look at is the staying power of the team. Most would agree that 90% of every venture success would come from perspiration, and not from inspiration! They also know that the management and engineering team will have to put in very long hours to compensate for the lack of employees and limited resources.

The ability to recruit the team is also a very important element that is considered when evaluating potential investments. Since this is my business, I can say without hesitation that it will probably become the biggest challenge for the new company, and may well far outweigh the technological challenge itself. Being able to show your ability to bring talented people to the team will greatly enhance your position with potential investors.

The fourth criteria is the ability to handle risk, and who has the intellectual power to evaluate risk Every one of our startups in the last seven to eight years has endured many twists and turns in their companies evolution and, simply put, the early years are the most traumatic. A solid management team must be capable of analyzing situations, evaluating the probability of success and be able to implement a plan. In this regard, we do know that the market can shift in a very short period of time and create havoc.

Communications skills are the fifth criteria. VCs are looking for people that can communicate their ideas clearly and effectively, not only to the potential investor, but to customers as well. The ability of the management team to convince the employees to work those required long hours is also essential. It is this verbal ability that separates good managers from technical inventors.

Finally, a detail orientation is a trait that investors find to have substantial value. Most of us probably think that entrepreneurs are good at looking at the big picture, while letting others handles the little details. Details not only involve numbers, but also involve driving a product from inception to real production ramp. The management team has to have the ability to maneuver through many mine fields to remain on track.

The Link to the article is http://www.planetanalog.com/columns/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=200001707

John Foxworth
Managing Dir – RF/Analog

john@analogsolutions.com
(O) 865-458-4421
(C) 865-250-6507

Thursday, January 04, 2007 

“Is there still money to made as an Analog Entrepreneur”



As we begin a new year in 2007 many analog professionals are evaluating their career options. As such, many are probably wondering whether there is still money to be made by starting their own venture. Before we look at the numbers and financial aspects I feel it is important to look at the criteria for building a successful company beyond the obvious financial aspects. Similar to the game of baseball a startup begins with four bases: 1st base is a market opportunity, 2nd base involves a customer need, 3rd base is the barriers to entry, and finally home plate is the business strategy. Additional elements for a successful startup: an experienced executive team who have worked together, a straight forward business model and exit strategy, excellent market timing and a cash efficient “Go to Market” strategy in a “High Growth Market”. Is it easy to succeed in today’s environment, NO, but then was it ever easy? It is important to pick the right horse and avoid areas that involve standards that have unpredictable outcomes. Yes there are a few examples of startups in recent years that have succeeded in standards based markets, but they are rare. Either way it is critical to be the best in whatever market is chosen because competition will be keen in any market whether you are competing with other startups, or larger more established companies! Time to market is King whether you have bleeding edge technology or a better mousetrap to existing technology. In either case you must have zero tolerance for error, since you will be resource limited. Many big potential customers will be reluctant to work with you for fear that your future is at risk. You must have a turnkey solution. A demo board is not a SOC in a system. There are mentoring services available from many Universities that will work with potential entrepreneurs to aide in their success.

The strategy for funding should be evaluated prior to approaching potential investors. The options include self-funding, angel investors, strategic partnerships, DARPA and Venture Capital. When considering Angels and VC funding it is wise to select those that can open doors and or help deliver something besides dollars. When assembling a BOD’s you must understand that board dynamics are critical and the success of the company can be affected by a board that disagrees on the strategic direction of the venture.

Now let’s shift to the monetary aspects. As of November 1st, 2006 125 Fabless companies received private capital, totaling 1.7 billion as compared to the same time last year, 121 deals totaled 1.4 billion. The industry is on track to raise more funding dollars year over year, however the number of deals is expected to stay flat in year over year growth. The numbers reflect the industry as a whole to include all semiconductor events. Mergers and Acquisitions in the Fabless world totaled 8.8 billion as of Nov 1st, a 132 % year over year increase. These numbers include the 5.4 billion AMD acquisition of ATI. If one takes this acquisition out of the picture the M&A dollar amount falls 11% year over year and the number of deals is flat. Since 2001 the 1st round funding looks like this:

51 31 55 59 50 25
01 02 03 04 05 06

The exits over the last 5 years look like this:


21 17 26 30 27 16
01 02 03 04 05 06

Now if we look at where the money goes on an exit:


50M Investment 100M exit 75M 500M

Investors 50M 25M 450M
All Founders (12%) 6M 3M 54M
Each Founder (4) 1.5M 0.75M 13.5M
Employees Total (15%) 8M 4M 68M
CEO/VPs/TAB/BOD (66%) 5M 2.5M 45M
Each Designer (20) 0.13M 0.064M 1.1M
For 2 rounds (30M)- Founder makes $2.6M 4 rounds (80M) $0.5M

*Numbers provided by: Henry Chang Designers Guide Consulting*

When we look at funding in the analog space most startups will require from 30-75 million to bring their 1st product to the market. After 3 good rounds of funding the founders will retain from 10-12 % of the company. This equity can obviously amount to a decent amount on even a 20-50 million dollar acquisition. Preferred Stock is returned first and included in common stock distribution. In the analog space you should be expecting a 6-7 year period for a good exit, and in the process focus on the means not the end! If you look at the successful startups’ in the analog space over the last 5 years those that enjoyed the best success were the 1st to ship in a large market, stayed focused, but remained agile, and were able to drop prices faster than their competition. They also provided differentiation in their products/solutions and continued to drive technology leadership. Most importantly, they have continued to build great teams with talented professionals and engineers.

So you ask yourself is this a viable career choice? As someone who has worked with, and placed a great number of analog professionals in my career; I can without question say that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks! Many feel that the risk is much greater than working for a big company. My experience has shown that the risk factor is about equal. Your biggest investment is time. Yes it is much more work and in some cases, a lot more stress, but in return most will tell you that it is a lot more fun! I am often asked whether it is better to join early or late in a startup? My answer would be either one, but what is more important than the potential financial gain is what the experience does to aide in your career progression! It is all about the journey! Most of the entrepreneurs I have dealt with over the years have told me that they learned much more from their mistakes’ than from their successes. If you look at the long term you will be rewarded over time!

Wednesday, October 04, 2006 

Employer/Candidate Challenges in a Demand Driven Time!



The demand for analog talent has continued to escalate in 2006 as organizations have continued to prosper and grow. Startups have continued to receive funding and as a result have continued to attempt to recruit top talent, which has brought about competitive challenges unseen since the late 90’s. Seasoned professionals in the areas of design, applications, marketing, product, and test are being presented with numerous opportunities are a regular basis. As a result of this activity, companies are being forced to become very aggressive at both keeping current employees happy and adjusting compensation packages accordingly. This is putting further strain on companies trying to lure these prospective candidates into accepting offers with their organizations. Outsourcing has been ineffective at replacing talented US engineers despite the fact that many US engineers fear that this is a serious threat to their survival! I don’t see this minor trend affecting the demand or the bigger picture in the near term. There are a number of things companies must do to increase their chances of success in the recruitment area in this current market. Beyond the obvious money issues, the hiring process is the key to improving the acceptance rate. It is vitally important to streamline the hiring process and respond quickly to candidates that meet or exceed the hiring expectations. The days of making long drawn out decisions and delaying on extending offers are over. Whether a given candidate is actively looking or passively looking it is certain that he/she will have multiple interviews. Any delays in the interviewing process or the decision process will almost certainly decrease the chances of landing the chosen candidate. It is imperative that companies become very good at marketing and selling their company to prospective candidates. Candidates have become much more adept at scrutinizing business models and analyzing technology trends.From the candidates’ side they are experiencing some challenges as well because of the numerous opportunities and the prolonged hiring process. Whereas, they would like to have all their options on the table prior to making a career decision, they are often forced to respond to the offers they have been presented. Because of the numerous opportunities and high demand for their skills it becomes a challenge to orchestrate the interviews within their time constraints. In many cases they are not able to complete the interviewing process with other prospective employers. In addition, another challenge can come from a candidate’s indecision about what it is that he is really interested in doing.The solutions are quite obvious for someone in my position, in that prospective candidates need to spend a little more time planning their careers so that they are certain as to what they are looking for in a career move. On the companies’ side, they must be more certain as to what they are seeking in a candidate, and then being more aggressive in the recruiting process.The hottest areas of demand in analog continue to be in Power Management, Wireless, and classical analog. We have also seen an increase in the demand for more junior level people for the first time since 2001. I would expect the 4th quarter to slow slightly, as this is a normal holiday time in addition to companies planning for the New Year’s activity. In a future column I will shed some detailed light on the process issues that will lead to better hiring decisions, and at the same time help organizations both large and small increase their chances of hiring in this current market. I will also devote a future column to helping candidates develop a plan that will ensure a more promising career. Stay tuned!

Contact Me / Profile

About me

  • I'm John Foxworth
  • From Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
  • I'm the leading RF/Analog / Mixed Signal Recruiter for the Semiconductor Industry. Whether or not you're looking for your next big career challenge, it would probably be worth the time and effort to get to know me. ____________________________ I would enjoy talking with you; please contact me at any time, just click the "Contact Me / Profile" link above my photo.
Powered by Blogger
and Blogger Templates